by Matt | Jan 22, 2016 | Cards
There’s several posts I’ve got lined up that deal with buying retail. It’s my closest option, it’s my only option if I want to buy something in person. In two of these posts I’m going to actually (hold on to something) give Topps praise for doing something right. This is not that post. This post is to illustrate when things go very very wrong.
Over the past month or two, I bought a couple blasters of 2015 Topps Baseball Update, as well as a couple boxes of the “Update Chrome” stuff. Normally I buy about one a month, during a normal Target run. On this particular day I bought two. I had just been paid, I hadn’t bought cards in a while, why not. Mostly I wanted the “Update Chrome” for the Chrome packs, which had that neat sparkle pattern thing going on this year. This is what I got…
8 cards per pack, here’s the first pack from each box…
PACK ONE
- Thomas Field – SAME
- Rearick & Mazzoni RC – SAME
- Stephen Vogt – SAME
- Joe Blanton – SAME
- Shane Victorino – SAME
- Ryan Lavarnway – SAME
- Yoenis Cespedes / Paulo Orlando – DIFFERENT
- Insert – Different
I didn’t realize what was happening until about pack 3, but I was thinking to myself “hmm, already got that Victorino card”. Little did I know…
PACK TWO
- Rafael Betancourt – SAME
- Jose Altuve – SAME
- Alex Claudio – SAME
- Todd Frazier – SAME
- JR Graham – SAME
- Joc Pederson – SAME
- Francoueur / Rizzo – DIFFERENT
- Insert – Different
Again, completely oblivious. I’m excited I got an extra Pederson RC, and more Todd Frazier and Jose Altuve are always good.
PACK THREE
- Alex Guerrero – SAME
- Scott Kazmir – SAME
- Justin Nicolino – SAME
- Joe Panik – SAME
- Manny Banuelos – SAME
- Randall Delgado – SAME
- Jason Heyward – SAME
- Insert – SAME type, DIFFERENT player
By now I’ve caught on. I normally option a pack and make a stack in front of me. At this point it was pack 3 of box 2, so I separated the two boxes worth and started looking back at what came out of box one. I wasn’t very pleased. I get the fact that these all come out of the same factory, cut from the same sheet, etc., but I always thought there was some sort of mechanism in place to help with collation of this stuff. A few duplicated cards isn’t a big deal. Heck, even if HALF the box was duplicated I doubt I would have cared. I would have chalked it up to just bad luck. Three identical packs in a row is a bit harder to take, but wait, there’s more…
Pack Four was mercifully different, there were only 2 duplicates (4 cards) in that one, it didn’t make it to the scanner. Pack 5 however, that came right back to the party…
PACK FIVE
- Sam Dyson – SAME
- Teijuan Walker – SAME
- Burgos / Hernandez – SAME
- Ross / Iglesias – SAME type, different player
- Cowgill / O’Sullivan – DIFFERENT
- Gonzalez / Pollock – DIFFERENT
- Romine / Zobrist – DIFFERENT
- Insert – SAME type, DIFFERENT player
While both packs had a couple of different cards, the fact that the rainbow foil parallel fell in EXACTLY the same spot, in the same pack, in the same card order was a little too much. It’s just like buying a hobby box and knowing that the bottom pack on the right has the auto in it. Again, mechanical process, the machine is making the packs, I get it. I know there isn’t a human being putting packs into boxes in a specific order just to mess with me. Then again, maybe there should be. Maybe all the packs should convalesce in a big pile and non-machine workers should put them into boxes randomly. That’s probably too much to ask.
I consider it a good lesson learned. Never buy two boxes from the same shelf or shipment on the same day. I would shake my fist at Topps and tell them this is unacceptable, but I’m pretty sure they stopped caring at some point in the 1980’s.
by Matt | Jan 21, 2016 | Cards
The best kind of Christmas cards aren’t those with wreathes and holly or pictures of fat Dutch saints with beards. The best kind of cards are small, covered in pictures from this crazy game called “base ball” and from friends. These particular cards came from my Yankee’s fan counter-part in New Jersey, AJ the Lost Collector. It’s always a great sign of the generosity in this hobby that fans who would normally be polar opposites with their team loyalties can trade numerous time and with such joy. Kind of restores your faith in humanity a little.
Pitchers who led the Sox to a World Series from a set I haven’t finished, an awesome way to start a package.
Two cards for Hall of Famer Pedro Martinez (that has such a nice ring to it).
Two Nomar cards I didn’t have, always a welcome sight.
Three from the “big dawg” Mo Vaughn, including a “Double Trouble” appearance by Nomar. Solid cards all around. I love the insane metallic purple floating eyeballs on the Pacific Metal Universe card.
Last but not least, the Large Father, looking all retro in Topps Heritage.
Awesome package AJ. A return package is forming itself in a pile on my desk!
by Matt | Jan 20, 2016 | Cards
I’m not exactly sure what my plan was regarding this card. It’s not like it fits into a box, or a page, or even my display case. Regardless, nabbing a 1/10 5×7 “Topps online exclusive” card for next to nothing was rather appealing.
It’s big, it’s huge, it’s 5×7 for goodness sake. I love it in it’s “I’m a wacky, different, sort of card” way. Apparently the regular versions were available online, but the red versions were only available in a set, and there were only 10 sets, so says the page on Topps.com (see here). They were also apparently $2k. Woah. So, some dealer got their hands on a set and split it up and sold them individually on ebay. The seller I bought this from had pretty much the rest of the set as well.
1/10 certainly isn’t shabby. The only real problem I can see is that Topps didn’t really seem to care about the production value. They used the same card stock, which is fine at 2.5×3.5, but starts to feel flimsy at 5×7. They also just “enlarged” the card design instead of recreating it at a higher resolution. You can see the obvious printing dots with the naked eye…
Lastly, they didn’t even bother to foil stamp the logo or the Future Stars writing.
I mean, if you’re willing to do that for 700 cards x millions of copies, why can’t you be bothered to do that for TEN copies of something you’re selling for big money. Oh, yeah, that’s right, it’s all about the money.
In the end, I don’t really care. It’s a conversation piece in my collection. It has the coolness to stand on it’s own, and I can’t believe I got it for less than $10. Oh, and did I mention it’s huge?
by Matt | Jul 29, 2015 | Aggravation, Cards, Tech
I’ve given up on BUNT. I tried to like it but it’s just impossible. It’s impossible for me to enjoy an app that doesn’t know what its trying to be, outside of a basic pay-to-win money grab, and that’s not something I can support.
Originally, I was told it was a “card collecting app” and that you collected digital cards. Ok, that’s fine, but what’s the point?
Then, as I’m trying it out, it completely shifts focus to “it’s like fantasy baseball, but with cards!”. Ok, I like fantasy baseball, but it has major issues with it’s contest formats. The contests really boil down to a “DraftKings” type format, where you’re picking cards each day, but its not about the skill in picking the players, it’s about having the players with the highest “boost” in points value. There are parallel cards to the regular ones, offering ever higher levels of points multipliers. If you don’t have an entire roster of Gold (2x pts) cards, at the bare minimum, you’re not winning squat. Even if you do win, you get coins, which in turn you use to buy packs. The packs have cards. Cards get you points, points get you coins, coins get you packs, packs get you cards.
At that point you’re in a never ending spiral of opening packs to find better cards to play. That pretty much describes the “pay to play” universe of micro-transactions, and that’s fine if that’s your thing. Its the same concept as Candy Crush or Clash of Clans, or anything else people are addicted to on their phones. Its just not my cup of tea.
(more…)
by Matt | Jul 17, 2015 | Cards
I don’t normally pimp contests around the blogosphere, but this one sounded excellent. Matt from Bubba’s Bangin’ Batch of Baseball Bits, which is an epic name for a blog if ever there was one, is holding a few Ginter themed contests at the moment. Ginter is right around the corner and you should most definitely check this out…
Clickity Click.
by Matt | Jul 9, 2015 | Aggravation, Cards
Or, the Bowman Conundrum. Or, the Organizational Dilemma. Or any of a number of synonyms for “First World Baseball Card Problems”.
I’ve reached that point where I need to reconsider how I’m organizing my cards. Some of it is ok. Team sets and complete sets, by years, in binders. Got it. It’s everything else that’s the issue.
I’m just going to “talk it out”, and maybe I can wrap my head around it as I go.
(more…)
Recent Comments